Looking for a coach? Sign up for a coaching consulting call today!
April 22, 2024

What to do with unwanted feedback

What to do with unwanted feedback
The player is loading ...
Clinician Researcher

Welcome to the Clinician Researcher Podcast with your host, Toyosi Onwuemene. In this episode, Dr Onwuemene shares insights on receiving feedback, especially when it feels discouraging or hurtful. Drawing from personal experiences in academic medicine, she offers guidance on how to process feedback constructively and move forward despite setbacks.

Key Points Discussed:

  • Acknowledge the emotional impact of rejection and allow yourself to mourn the disappointment.
  • Give space between receiving feedback and formulating your plan of action.
  • After processing your initial emotions, approach feedback with a fresh perspective.
  • Recognize that even harsh feedback can contain valuable information.
  • Formulate a clear plan to address feedback..
  • Viewing obstacles as clarifying moments.
  • Live authentically and pursue work that aligns with your personal values and aspirations.

Links and Resources Mentioned:

  • Connect with Toyosi Onwuemene on Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook.

Call to Action:

If you've recently faced rejection or discouraging feedback, remember that you're not alone. Share this episode with someone who could benefit from encouragement and guidance in navigating setbacks. Keep pushing forward, and don't hesitate to seek support or mentorship along the way.

Sponsor/Advertising/Monetization Information:

This episode is sponsored by Coag Coach LLC, a leading provider of coaching resources for clinicians transitioning to become research leaders. Coag Coach LLC is committed to supporting clinicians in their scholarship.

Looking for a coach?

Sign up for a coaching discovery call today: https://www.coagcoach.com/service-page/consultation-call-1

Transcript
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills

2
00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260
to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.

3
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340
As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients.

4
00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380
When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find

5
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780
that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research

6
00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,200
program.

7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,480
Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit.

8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580
However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs.

9
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200
For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians

10
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800
the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.

11
00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,060
Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene.

12
00:01:01,060 --> 00:01:03,460
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast.

13
00:01:03,460 --> 00:01:07,360
I'm your host Toyosi Onwuemene, and what an absolute pleasure it is to be talking with

14
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:08,360
you today.

15
00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:09,360
Thank you so much for tuning in.

16
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:15,800
I am talking today about how to receive feedback, especially when it feels like it's poison.

17
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:19,000
Okay, that's an exceptionally long title.

18
00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,040
By the time I go to edit, I will decide on a better title.

19
00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:26,460
But right now what I'm talking about is feedback that makes you feel so awful, you feel like

20
00:01:26,460 --> 00:01:28,720
you could just explode.

21
00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:33,400
And I want to share this because I do know that in academic medicine there's a lot of

22
00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:37,920
rejection, whether it is that you're submitting manuscripts to be accepted for publication,

23
00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:41,120
or you're submitting grants, or you're making proposals.

24
00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:45,400
You've been met with probably more nos than you've been met with yeses.

25
00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:51,260
And so to some extent, academic medicine is a process of getting used to getting no without

26
00:01:51,260 --> 00:01:54,040
wilting under the pressure, right?

27
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:56,240
There's so much rejection.

28
00:01:56,240 --> 00:02:00,880
And many times for any of us going through rejection, there's the feeling of isolation,

29
00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,560
and sometimes the feeling of shame and discouragement.

30
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:11,320
And I just want to share that it is actually natural to experience rejection, and it is

31
00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:12,960
part of your journey.

32
00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:18,400
And very soon, actually, I will say there's no time you're ever celebrating a rejection

33
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:24,120
for the most part, but over time, it ceases to have as much of a sting as it did the first

34
00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:25,120
time.

35
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,300
That being said, I'd like to share a story that actually still feels a little bit stingy

36
00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:31,880
to me.

37
00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:33,800
I submitted a manuscript for acceptance.

38
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:38,400
And actually, this was my first opinion piece, and I really was excited about writing it.

39
00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:40,200
I had so much fun writing it.

40
00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:43,960
I submitted this manuscript, and I was so excited to hear the feedback.

41
00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:48,640
Well, when the feedback came, it was horrendous.

42
00:02:48,640 --> 00:02:53,160
And when I'm saying horrendous, you know, if somebody tells you that, wow, your paper

43
00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:54,160
is puke?

44
00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:55,480
Yes, that's how it felt.

45
00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:57,280
Now, I'm not saying that's what the reviewer said.

46
00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:58,440
They certainly didn't say that.

47
00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:02,280
But when I read the feedback, that was the sense that I got that this paper was so bad,

48
00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:04,600
it should never have been written, right?

49
00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:09,960
And I will tell you that when I first read the feedback, I thought, what is this?

50
00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:14,600
I tell you, I read a lot of rejections.

51
00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:18,040
And I'm sure that I've never had a rejection where I'm like, thank you so much.

52
00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:19,520
This was so awesome.

53
00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:24,680
But this was one especially bad rejection where it almost felt as if the reviewer was

54
00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:29,920
going out of their way to rub my face in how bad my piece was.

55
00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:34,880
And I remember reading at the end of it and saying, okay, what do I take out of this?

56
00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:35,880
And I was struggling.

57
00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:37,240
I was struggling.

58
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:40,400
Because really, what good feedback should do is move you forward.

59
00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:45,160
And every time you enter into a situation where feedback actually doesn't have a clear

60
00:03:45,160 --> 00:03:48,800
path forward, it's a sign that it's not really feedback.

61
00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:51,200
It's poison disguised as feedback.

62
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:53,360
Why is that poison disguised as feedback?

63
00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:54,760
Because you know what?

64
00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:58,240
In life, there are so many of us that are so super successful.

65
00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:03,540
We have so many letters to our name, and we've got so much funding, and we've published trillions

66
00:04:03,540 --> 00:04:06,440
of articles and we're still hurting inside.

67
00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:08,880
And we're still just inadequate inside.

68
00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:13,960
Or we feel bad, or we don't feel like we like ourselves or the world.

69
00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:18,520
And so just because externally there are markers of success does not mean that people don't

70
00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:20,280
walk around with poison inside them.

71
00:04:20,280 --> 00:04:23,360
And here's the thing about poison when it lives inside people.

72
00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:28,440
And when I'm talking about poison, I'm talking about bitterness and anger and just all the

73
00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:34,520
ugly stuff that lives inside people, unforgiveness, it comes out and it hurts other people.

74
00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:38,160
You know how people talk about how a hurting person hurts others?

75
00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:40,360
Yes, that's exactly right.

76
00:04:40,360 --> 00:04:43,920
Because hey, if you're reading a manuscript, your job is to say, this is how it could be

77
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:45,160
made better.

78
00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:49,080
And even if you think it sucks so bad, you can always find ways to say, this is how it

79
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:50,840
could be made better.

80
00:04:50,840 --> 00:04:58,720
But in a way, insulting someone who's written something is not even a sign of being a bad

81
00:04:58,720 --> 00:04:59,720
reviewer.

82
00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:04,080
It's a sign that there's something wrong inside you that maybe you need to address.

83
00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:10,120
Anyway, that being said, this is not the story of this reviewer.

84
00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:11,640
It's a story of me.

85
00:05:11,640 --> 00:05:15,440
It's a story of how I received that feedback and what I do with it.

86
00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:20,720
What do I do with feedback, especially when it just doesn't feel like it's right?

87
00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:22,160
What do I do?

88
00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:28,080
Number one is to acknowledge that you have been wounded.

89
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:30,440
Yes, acknowledge that you've been wounded.

90
00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:36,040
Now, no matter the feedback, if it's a rejection, it doesn't feel good.

91
00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:40,120
For some of us, we've had enough rejections where we're not as bothered.

92
00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:43,240
Sometimes actually you submit something, you're like, if this gets in, it'll be a miracle.

93
00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:47,880
And then when it comes back, reject it, you're like, yeah, I knew it was a long shot.

94
00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:51,840
But even when you knew it was a long shot, you knew it was going to be rejected and it

95
00:05:51,840 --> 00:05:55,860
still comes back rejected.

96
00:05:55,860 --> 00:05:59,740
You knew it was a long shot and it still comes back rejected.

97
00:05:59,740 --> 00:06:02,660
You still feel a little bit wounded.

98
00:06:02,660 --> 00:06:03,660
You do.

99
00:06:03,660 --> 00:06:07,200
You feel hurt because you wanted them to accept it.

100
00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:13,320
Even if secretly, even if you openly thought they wouldn't accept it, secretly you did.

101
00:06:13,320 --> 00:06:17,820
And you would have felt validated by the acceptance, but instead you got a rejection.

102
00:06:17,820 --> 00:06:22,080
And so I think the first step is just to acknowledge your wounding and say, you know what, that

103
00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:23,080
sucks.

104
00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:24,080
It hurts.

105
00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:26,440
It hurts because it does.

106
00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:29,920
And it's only human to feel bad at rejection.

107
00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,680
Like whoever wants to be rejected, nobody.

108
00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:39,320
And so if you're rejected, instead of just grinning and bearing it, acknowledge it.

109
00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:46,040
If you're someone who gets frustrated and nothing, the tears just come, let them fall.

110
00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:51,320
Give yourself time to mourn the loss of this particular experience.

111
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:55,320
Give yourself time to get over the rejection.

112
00:06:55,320 --> 00:07:03,400
In reality, it hurts and it's okay to acknowledge the pain and to just mourn that pain or at

113
00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:07,000
least experience that pain for even a moment.

114
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:11,200
But definitely allow yourself to experience the pain and acknowledge that the pain is

115
00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:12,200
present.

116
00:07:12,200 --> 00:07:14,360
Hey, this is disappointing.

117
00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:15,360
Say it to yourself.

118
00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:18,280
Hey, hey, this is disappointing.

119
00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:20,640
Okay, great.

120
00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:22,200
That's the first step.

121
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:24,200
Acknowledge that you've been wounded in some way.

122
00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:26,560
Acknowledge that you've been hurt.

123
00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:31,720
The second thing we need to do is you need to pause.

124
00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:32,720
Now what am I saying?

125
00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:37,880
Am I saying pause and just live in that rejection for three months and say, oh my gosh, woe

126
00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:38,880
is me.

127
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:40,120
I'll never submit another manuscript again.

128
00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:41,360
I'll never write another grant.

129
00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:43,240
In fact, I quit medicine.

130
00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,180
No, that's not what I'm talking about.

131
00:07:46,180 --> 00:07:50,640
Pausing is giving yourself distance between the first time you review the feedback and

132
00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:53,640
when you have a plan for what to do with the feedback.

133
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:54,640
Okay.

134
00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:59,680
Pausing is to give yourself time to come up with a plan of action.

135
00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:03,640
Every rejected manuscript is an accepted manuscript waiting to happen.

136
00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:10,120
It's literally the acceptance is sitting there waiting for you, but only if you move forward.

137
00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:12,560
But you can't move forward until you have a plan.

138
00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:16,360
And to be honest, you don't move forward well when you're wounded and still reveling in

139
00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:17,360
your sorrow.

140
00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:21,760
Now, I don't want you to revel in sorrow for too long, but you do need to have a gap between

141
00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:25,520
the first reading and the final decision for a plan.

142
00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:27,000
And here's the thing.

143
00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:29,440
As soon as you've read it, your mind has processed it.

144
00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:33,600
And already you're working through a thinking of like, what do I do now?

145
00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:35,680
Hopefully you're not thinking, well, I quit.

146
00:08:35,680 --> 00:08:36,760
That's what.

147
00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:41,520
Hopefully you're thinking, okay, let me set it aside and then come up with a plan later.

148
00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:46,280
And the reason it's important to give yourself a gap between the first reading of it and

149
00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:50,400
when you finally want to come back to it is because your subconscious mind continues to

150
00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:52,240
work on the problem.

151
00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:56,140
Your subconscious mind accepts the fact that you've been rejected.

152
00:08:56,140 --> 00:09:01,480
And then it feels differently the next time you come to the piece of rejection or the

153
00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:02,800
feedback that you got.

154
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,000
And so the third thing is to read it, go back and review it.

155
00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:08,000
Okay.

156
00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:10,280
So the first thing is that you've acknowledged that this hurt.

157
00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:14,120
The second thing is you've given yourself space between the first time you read it and

158
00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:15,120
later.

159
00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:16,980
And the third time is you come back to it.

160
00:09:16,980 --> 00:09:17,980
So here you are.

161
00:09:17,980 --> 00:09:20,280
The third point is that you come back to it.

162
00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:21,480
So here you are.

163
00:09:21,480 --> 00:09:22,480
You're finally reading it again.

164
00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:26,160
And what you'll notice if you've given yourself enough time between the first reading and

165
00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:29,240
now is that you come at it with a different perspective.

166
00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:35,200
At first, it actually was kind of like you, the shock of being rejected was so overwhelming

167
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:39,360
that you didn't even really have time to think about what were all the benefits or what are

168
00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:45,120
all the merits of what was brought up in, in whatever the case was against accepting

169
00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:47,600
your manuscript or accepting your proposal.

170
00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:48,600
Right.

171
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:52,560
And then when you come at it a second time, you come at it with a different perspective.

172
00:09:52,560 --> 00:09:58,840
There's less of the hurt, less of the sting and more of an objectivity, more of a, okay,

173
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:03,880
let's see what feedback is useful here that I can use to move this work forward.

174
00:10:03,880 --> 00:10:08,080
And you know what, for better or for worse, there will always be feedback that you could

175
00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:10,080
use to move this work forward.

176
00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:13,920
Now in the particular rejection story I tell you, it did feel pretty scathing.

177
00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:17,540
It didn't really feel like there was real feedback there.

178
00:10:17,540 --> 00:10:20,960
You know, when you read something and you're like, you just really hate this paper, don't

179
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:21,960
you?

180
00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,200
You hate it so much, you see no good in it.

181
00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:25,200
And that's fine.

182
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:26,200
People are people.

183
00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:27,200
Sometimes that's the way it is.

184
00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:29,320
People are just like, this sucks so bad.

185
00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:31,240
And it, that's how they feel about it.

186
00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:33,360
And you can't argue how they feel about it.

187
00:10:33,360 --> 00:10:37,760
Now nothing sucks so bad that it cannot be salvaged, but I'm listening and I'm hearing

188
00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:42,200
people say, oh yeah, there are things that suck so bad, it cannot be salvaged.

189
00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:45,840
But one man's meat is another man's poison, which you think sucks so bad and cannot be

190
00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:47,040
salvaged.

191
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:51,920
Nobody else can see the kernel of goodness that can be expanded to grow.

192
00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:52,920
Okay.

193
00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:58,140
I say all that to say that no matter how tremendous the feedback was, no matter how much the person

194
00:10:58,140 --> 00:11:02,720
actually didn't give you feedback, but went off on a diatribe about how you suck and everybody

195
00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:08,280
from your institution should stop writing manuscripts.

196
00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:10,480
Somewhere there, there is information.

197
00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:11,480
Okay.

198
00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:13,160
That's number four.

199
00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:15,960
Number four is gather the information.

200
00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:17,080
Okay.

201
00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:18,680
What do I mean?

202
00:11:18,680 --> 00:11:25,260
Number one, the feedback, if it was good feedback should really outline steps for improvement.

203
00:11:25,260 --> 00:11:27,280
Here is how this manuscript could be improved.

204
00:11:27,280 --> 00:11:32,280
And if you're a good reviewer and I hope you are, I'm not saying good or bad because that's

205
00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:37,200
never really useful, but if you're going to be a helpful reviewer, when you review, you

206
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:40,340
need to point out places where improvements could be made.

207
00:11:40,340 --> 00:11:47,120
For example, you could say, hmm, the generic use of language reads like the use of a large

208
00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:50,360
language model like chat GPT.

209
00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:55,120
I would recommend that if such a model was used, it not be used for the revisions.

210
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:56,120
Do you see?

211
00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:57,120
Very helpful.

212
00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:59,480
It's like, instead of saying, holy cow, did you use chat GPT?

213
00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:00,480
This is awful.

214
00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:04,560
You're saying, hmm, it reads like you may have used chat GPT to write this paper.

215
00:12:04,560 --> 00:12:06,960
Maybe you don't use it next time.

216
00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:07,960
Useful feedback.

217
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:12,240
If you're a reviewer, please, please, please, instead of yelling or going off in a diatribe,

218
00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:15,800
showing what's really inside you, give feedback that's useful.

219
00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:16,800
Okay.

220
00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:18,400
So useful feedback helps you move forward.

221
00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:19,640
You can gather that information.

222
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:20,680
That's pretty easy.

223
00:12:20,680 --> 00:12:25,840
The feedback that says step one, change the way you use these terms or the feedback that

224
00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:28,240
says step two, do this, do that.

225
00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:29,240
That's helpful.

226
00:12:29,240 --> 00:12:30,680
You can easily gather information.

227
00:12:30,680 --> 00:12:33,420
What about the feedback that is the diatribe?

228
00:12:33,420 --> 00:12:37,560
The feedback that is the, this sucks so bad, I can't believe you're still writing or that

229
00:12:37,560 --> 00:12:38,880
you're still alive, right?

230
00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:39,880
There is that feedback.

231
00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:40,880
Let's just be real.

232
00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:41,880
There is that feedback.

233
00:12:41,880 --> 00:12:43,580
What do you do with that?

234
00:12:43,580 --> 00:12:44,580
Take the information.

235
00:12:44,580 --> 00:12:47,580
And you're like, what information?

236
00:12:47,580 --> 00:12:51,400
The information that that's not where you want to go with your paper.

237
00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:53,400
You're like, what do you mean?

238
00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:55,120
There's the New England Journal of Medicine.

239
00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:56,800
I've always wanted to publish here.

240
00:12:56,800 --> 00:13:02,060
I am so glad that that's your childhood dream, but it's not the dream from this paper, clearly

241
00:13:02,060 --> 00:13:08,560
because this paper is not going to be looked at favorably by this particular community.

242
00:13:08,560 --> 00:13:13,560
And I know in academia, there's a lot of what's a high impact journal, what's the low impact

243
00:13:13,560 --> 00:13:17,760
journal and where should you try to get your work into and what should you not try to get

244
00:13:17,760 --> 00:13:19,480
your work into.

245
00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:22,960
That's a whole conversation for a different podcast.

246
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:29,760
But at the bottom of your writing for peer review is that you do excellent work.

247
00:13:29,760 --> 00:13:34,200
You want feedback so that your excellent work can be presented in the best possible light

248
00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:36,840
and go out into the world and do good.

249
00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,040
That's at the bottom of all of it.

250
00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,760
For every manuscript, there is a home.

251
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:45,920
Some homes look a little bit more appealing than others, but there is a home for every

252
00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:47,180
manuscript.

253
00:13:47,180 --> 00:13:53,440
And sometimes the information you take is that, wow, this manuscript could not scale

254
00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:58,960
the security of or could not get past the security of this particular journal.

255
00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:05,520
And you decide, do I take it to a journal with a less stringent security team or do

256
00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:12,960
I say, what will it take to scale the wall of this particular impregnable fortress of

257
00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:14,160
a journal?

258
00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:19,760
And it may be that that's what you want to do, but take the information and use it.

259
00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:25,480
If it's a scathing review, it may be that you say, well, I guess this journal is not

260
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:26,480
for me.

261
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:30,760
Or you might be like, okay, well, let's go knock on the door again and say, can you help

262
00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:32,760
me know how I can make this better?

263
00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:35,440
And sometimes you do that and you succeed.

264
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:40,040
For example, I had a manuscript that I once submitted and it was a really interesting

265
00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:44,280
article idea to me, but I was also writing in an era that was outside of my expertise.

266
00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:47,640
And I think I recognized that and I thought, oh, I can write in this area.

267
00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:54,400
So I was writing kind of in hematology, but I was also writing in a genre that, oh gosh,

268
00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:55,400
what was it?

269
00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:59,200
It may have been medical decision-making, which it's hematology and I make medical decisions

270
00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:03,320
all the time, but people are very specific about their specific kind of expertise, a

271
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:05,200
specific kind of language they used.

272
00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:07,240
Anyway, I got rejected.

273
00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:10,280
But what was interesting is that the journal said, you know what?

274
00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:12,560
We can't accept this manuscript in its current format.

275
00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:16,700
If you significantly revised it, maybe we could reconsider it.

276
00:15:16,700 --> 00:15:20,000
So they kind of opened a little bit of door and I was like, okay, well, let's go at it

277
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:21,000
again.

278
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:22,520
And we revised it, revised it, revised it.

279
00:15:22,520 --> 00:15:23,720
We sent it back.

280
00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:24,720
And they sent it back again.

281
00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:25,720
And I was like, you know what?

282
00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:30,480
Wow, this is a great case, but oh my gosh, your attempts are just, they're just, they're

283
00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:31,480
awful.

284
00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:32,720
Like, I mean, they didn't say it in that way.

285
00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:36,600
They were actually very, very helpful in just saying, this is how, if you were going to

286
00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:40,360
revise the paper, you would need to do this, but holy cow, that's a great undertaking.

287
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:42,520
I'm not sure you're going to be able to do this.

288
00:15:42,520 --> 00:15:48,120
And so what we finally did was we went and we found somebody who had very specific expertise

289
00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:49,280
in this kind of writing.

290
00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:50,920
I know I'm calling it medical decision-making.

291
00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:56,200
I'm now blanking on what it actually was, but it's, anyway, the point I'm making is

292
00:15:56,200 --> 00:15:59,600
I got someone who was an expert in writing these kinds of papers and that I asked the

293
00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:00,600
editor.

294
00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:04,200
I said, Hey, we really think this is a great case and we think that people are going to

295
00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:07,760
learn from it, but we are not well versed in writing in this way.

296
00:16:07,760 --> 00:16:09,800
Who do you know who might work with us?

297
00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:11,840
I asked the editor that.

298
00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:15,840
And to be honest, the first time I sent a letter to the editor, I got no response.

299
00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:20,220
And then I went and looked at other people who had been associate editors or other people

300
00:16:20,220 --> 00:16:23,880
who had in some way, shape or form been associated with a journal.

301
00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:25,800
You could say I was stalking the journal.

302
00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:32,020
Maybe I was because I was like, no, this journal, this article is getting in here.

303
00:16:32,020 --> 00:16:36,960
And finally, finally they turn around and say, okay, I have nothing to do with this,

304
00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:40,760
but you should reach out to this person who frequently writes these kinds of articles.

305
00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:41,820
Great.

306
00:16:41,820 --> 00:16:43,200
And then they made the introduction.

307
00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:48,520
It was so awesome because now we had an expert in our field, in our, in our, in our court,

308
00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:49,520
right?

309
00:16:49,520 --> 00:16:50,520
In 2019.

310
00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:52,280
And that expert really helped us.

311
00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:54,640
It really, he really helped us shape the article.

312
00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:59,240
And when we finally submitted, we got another revision, but this time it was that this is

313
00:16:59,240 --> 00:17:00,600
a great article.

314
00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:02,060
Here's how you make it better.

315
00:17:02,060 --> 00:17:06,040
And so sometimes the information you receive is that, oh, wow, it sucks so bad.

316
00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:08,200
Well, how can I make it not suck so bad?

317
00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:12,860
And you go after that information and you don't stop until you get it.

318
00:17:12,860 --> 00:17:14,520
Or sometimes you say, you know what?

319
00:17:14,520 --> 00:17:17,200
I don't have time to be chasing or trying to knock down this wall.

320
00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:21,840
How about I just take it somewhere else that doesn't have a security system that's so,

321
00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:23,880
so intense, right?

322
00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:25,080
Information.

323
00:17:25,080 --> 00:17:27,720
You can use the information to your advantage.

324
00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,800
What you don't want to do is to be overwhelmed, but you do want to use the information to

325
00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:32,800
your advantage.

326
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:36,440
And even when it's a scathing review, it is helpful information.

327
00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:40,000
And you have to ask yourself, what do you want to do about it?

328
00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:41,120
And that is the next thing.

329
00:17:41,120 --> 00:17:42,560
I think it's number five now.

330
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:46,960
I'm not counting now, but not the number five is, is what is your plan?

331
00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:48,560
Like formulate a plan.

332
00:17:48,560 --> 00:17:52,760
Now, to be honest, formulate a plan should have been at the very beginning when you first

333
00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:53,840
submitted your manuscript.

334
00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:58,160
You should have had a list of three journals that you were going to submit to tier one,

335
00:17:58,160 --> 00:17:59,500
tier two, tier three.

336
00:17:59,500 --> 00:18:02,920
And as soon as you knew that tier one was rejecting your work, you would be like, oops,

337
00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:03,920
sucks for you tier one.

338
00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:04,920
You'll go to tier two.

339
00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:07,560
And then tier two is like, yeah, we hate this work too.

340
00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:09,000
You're like, sucks for you tier two.

341
00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,240
And then you go to tier three, right?

342
00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:15,960
That's kind of the pre-planning you do at the beginning of any, every manuscript.

343
00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:16,960
We don't always do that.

344
00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:20,440
And to be honest, in this particular manuscript I'm referencing, did not do that.

345
00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:22,640
So now I'm like, oh, I don't know where else I want to send it.

346
00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:24,400
I haven't really done this work.

347
00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:32,720
Well, whatever, no matter when you decide to have a plan, just have a plan and it's

348
00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:33,720
okay.

349
00:18:33,720 --> 00:18:34,720
And what is your plan?

350
00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:37,720
Your plan is, well, what am I going to do with this paper?

351
00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:39,280
Where do I want to send it to?

352
00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:40,480
How do I want to revise it?

353
00:18:40,480 --> 00:18:43,800
So it's meets that other audience's criteria.

354
00:18:43,800 --> 00:18:45,720
What do I want to do with this paper?

355
00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:46,840
Have a plan.

356
00:18:46,840 --> 00:18:50,920
And then of course, the last thing is execute on that plan.

357
00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:51,920
Execute on that plan.

358
00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:58,880
You know, and it seems a little bit obvious, but in reality, many of us stop at like number

359
00:18:58,880 --> 00:19:00,440
one, where we're just so wounded.

360
00:19:00,440 --> 00:19:01,440
We're like, you know what?

361
00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:02,440
Academia sucks.

362
00:19:02,440 --> 00:19:03,440
I am no good at it.

363
00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:04,880
I'm really horrible at writing.

364
00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:06,160
I don't know how to write grants.

365
00:19:06,160 --> 00:19:08,720
I just am not going to do this anymore.

366
00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:13,400
And I just want to say, please don't let that be you.

367
00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:18,720
Don't be the person who allows obstacles to throw them off course.

368
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:20,800
Now here's the thing about obstacles.

369
00:19:20,800 --> 00:19:25,360
Obstacles are actually kind of clarifying because when an obstacle comes in front of

370
00:19:25,360 --> 00:19:28,120
you, you have to decide to do something about it, right?

371
00:19:28,120 --> 00:19:29,120
You're on your way.

372
00:19:29,120 --> 00:19:30,120
You're in motion.

373
00:19:30,120 --> 00:19:33,640
All of a sudden this big boulder drops out of the sky, narrowly misses you, lands in

374
00:19:33,640 --> 00:19:35,760
front of you, blocks the path.

375
00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:36,840
Okay.

376
00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:38,640
You have to do something about it.

377
00:19:38,640 --> 00:19:43,480
The question is, are you going to find a way through the boulder?

378
00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:46,000
Like are you going to try to blast it out of your way?

379
00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:48,400
Are you going to try to find a way over the boulder?

380
00:19:48,400 --> 00:19:52,200
Are you going to see if you can dig a tunnel and go under the boulder or are you going

381
00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:53,920
to walk away from the boulder?

382
00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:56,320
Are you going to say, you know what, this boulder?

383
00:19:56,320 --> 00:20:03,680
I know, but it's clarifying, but don't let an obstacle stop you because the question

384
00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:06,680
is should you be on this path?

385
00:20:06,680 --> 00:20:11,040
And it's really a question you ask before the obstacle comes because obstacles don't

386
00:20:11,040 --> 00:20:12,600
define you.

387
00:20:12,600 --> 00:20:14,240
They don't define where you're going.

388
00:20:14,240 --> 00:20:16,120
They don't define who you are.

389
00:20:16,120 --> 00:20:17,840
They clarify for you.

390
00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:20,400
Is this the path you actually want to be on?

391
00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:23,760
And if it is the path, then don't let the obstacle stop you.

392
00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:27,240
Let the obstacle be your jumping off point.

393
00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:32,080
So it's like, okay, well, here you are, big bad boulder in the middle of my path.

394
00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:38,840
How about I build a bridge or a ramp and ride a really fast motorcycle and use you to catapult

395
00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:41,320
to the next level?

396
00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:43,000
Absolutely could do that.

397
00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:48,860
But that's only if you have clarity that the path you're on is the path you want to be.

398
00:20:48,860 --> 00:20:51,800
Don't let obstacles make decisions for you.

399
00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:55,480
Don't let negative feedback make decisions for you.

400
00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:57,320
Make decisions for yourself.

401
00:20:57,320 --> 00:21:03,000
Make decisions regarding your purpose and why you want to do what you're doing.

402
00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:09,200
And if this is the field for you, one horrible feedback from one or two reviewers should

403
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:12,480
not make you change off that path.

404
00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:15,640
So in summary, please don't quit.

405
00:21:15,640 --> 00:21:18,160
Don't quit because you got a horrible review.

406
00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:22,680
You know, unfortunately, there are many more where those came from and it's okay.

407
00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:26,840
The important thing is, are you doing work that matters to you?

408
00:21:26,840 --> 00:21:28,800
Are you doing work that resonates with you?

409
00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:31,880
Are you doing work that makes you proud of the work you do?

410
00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:36,600
And if the answer is no, then why are you doing this work?

411
00:21:36,600 --> 00:21:40,960
If you're like, well, I'm just looking because, you know, at my institution, they say we're

412
00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:44,960
supposed to submit manuscripts and I just want to, I just want to check the boxes.

413
00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,280
I want to say, please stop checking boxes.

414
00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:51,320
Life is just not, it's about so much more than just checking boxes.

415
00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:56,500
And I know you succeeded getting through med school and residency and fellowship by checking

416
00:21:56,500 --> 00:21:57,500
boxes.

417
00:21:57,500 --> 00:22:00,560
I know because I checked those boxes too.

418
00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:06,200
But there comes a point in life when we decide that checking boxes is not the way to live.

419
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,400
And I'm thinking that's now.

420
00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:09,400
This is the moment.

421
00:22:09,400 --> 00:22:12,080
Like if you're listening to me, it's now.

422
00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:17,600
Because checking boxes, when there's a big obstacle that comes or a really huge rejection

423
00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:23,440
or a huge disappointment, then you find out that checking boxes doesn't satisfy and it's

424
00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:25,880
not enough to move you forward.

425
00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:30,440
So I want to encourage you that if for whatever reason you are a box checking person and there's

426
00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:32,760
no shame, I love box checking.

427
00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:36,640
I still think a good box checking gets me through my day.

428
00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:40,440
But I want you to think about how do you do your career differently?

429
00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:42,020
How do you do it differently?

430
00:22:42,020 --> 00:22:44,760
How do you stop doing what everybody else says you should do?

431
00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:50,280
How do you stop living like everybody else says you should live and begin to really live

432
00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:55,840
for your purpose, for something that resonates with the deepest core of who you are and that

433
00:22:55,840 --> 00:22:58,600
moves you to where you're supposed to be?

434
00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:02,120
If you don't know that, I invite you to come work with me as your coach.

435
00:23:02,120 --> 00:23:07,600
So you'll see on Wemina, I am available on Instagram, most especially LinkedIn, also

436
00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:08,600
on Facebook.

437
00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:13,820
Reach out to me and let's set up a 30 minute conversation just to talk about what you need

438
00:23:13,820 --> 00:23:16,200
and how you're going to move forward in your academic career.

439
00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:23,760
But if you're miserable in any way, if you are overwhelmed or tired or burned out, I

440
00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:26,520
want to say it doesn't have to be that way.

441
00:23:26,520 --> 00:23:27,920
Don't accept it.

442
00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:30,960
Okay, so I'm going to summarize.

443
00:23:30,960 --> 00:23:34,600
First of all, you got it when you get bad feedback, something that's so horrible.

444
00:23:34,600 --> 00:23:37,120
Number one, you just got to acknowledge the hurt.

445
00:23:37,120 --> 00:23:39,480
You've got to acknowledge that you've been wounded.

446
00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:41,120
Number two, you've got to separate yourself.

447
00:23:41,120 --> 00:23:44,520
Just give yourself a gap between your first reading and your next reading.

448
00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:47,860
Number three, you do have to come back to it and give it another look and you'll find

449
00:23:47,860 --> 00:23:50,440
that you're seeing it with a new perspective.

450
00:23:50,440 --> 00:23:56,120
Number four, you want to draw out the information of this particular piece of feedback, no matter

451
00:23:56,120 --> 00:23:57,560
how bad it's giving you.

452
00:23:57,560 --> 00:24:00,000
Number five, you want to come up with a plan.

453
00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:02,960
Number six, you actually want to act on that plan.

454
00:24:02,960 --> 00:24:07,920
Number seven, you want to make sure that you know what to do with this obstacle and that

455
00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:13,360
it doesn't derail you or keep you from having the career that you were meant to have.

456
00:24:13,360 --> 00:24:15,880
All right, it's been a pleasure talking with you today.

457
00:24:15,880 --> 00:24:17,400
Thank you so much for paying attention.

458
00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:21,200
Please, please, please, please share this episode with somebody else who's just been

459
00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:24,040
rejected and needs this encouragement.

460
00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:25,040
Thanks for listening.

461
00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:35,720
I look forward to seeing you again next time on the Clinician Researcher Podcast.

462
00:24:35,720 --> 00:24:41,080
Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher Podcast, where academic

463
00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:46,560
clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether or not they

464
00:24:46,560 --> 00:24:47,840
are a mentor.

465
00:24:47,840 --> 00:24:53,800
If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself.

466
00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:55,680
Someone else needs to hear it.

467
00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:59,720
So take a minute right now and share it.

468
00:24:59,720 --> 00:25:05,200
As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation

469
00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:18,080
of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.